Czechia vs Kazakhstan: Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled
Czechia
39,185 t
in 2024
Kazakhstan
41,700 t
in 2024
Czechia rank
67th
Kazakhstan rank
66th
Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled over time
- Czechia
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 41,700 t against 39,185 t in Czechia, a difference of 2,515 t.
That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 1.1 times Czechia's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Czechia ranks 67th and Kazakhstan ranks 66th of 212 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Czechia averaged higher in 2 and Kazakhstan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 48,528 t | 57,314 t | 8,786 t | Kazakhstan |
| 2000s | 43,631 t | 14,040 t | 29,591 t | Czechia |
| 2010s | 46,844 t | 31,178 t | 15,665 t | Czechia |
| 2020s | 37,911 t | 51,773 t | 13,862 t | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled, Czechia or Kazakhstan?
- Kazakhstan, at 41,700 t against 39,185 t in Czechia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled between Czechia and Kazakhstan?
- 2,515 t, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Kazakhstan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2024.
- How do Czechia and Kazakhstan rank globally for nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled?
- Czechia ranks 67th and Kazakhstan ranks 66th of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use with 115 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.