Dominica vs Puerto Rico: Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled
Dominica
150 t
in 2024
Puerto Rico
230 t
in 2024
Dominica rank
173rd
Puerto Rico rank
170th
Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled over time
- Dominica
- Puerto Rico
How they compare
Puerto Rico currently reports 230 t against 150 t in Dominica, a difference of 80 t.
That makes Puerto Rico's figure about 1.5 times Dominica's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Puerto Rico ahead.
Dominica ranks 173rd and Puerto Rico ranks 170th of 212 countries.
Puerto Rico has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominica | Puerto Rico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 285.62 t | 394.25 t | 108.62 t | Puerto Rico |
| 2010s | 228.3 t | 720.1 t | 491.8 t | Puerto Rico |
| 2020s | 119.6 t | 262.2 t | 142.6 t | Puerto Rico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled, Dominica or Puerto Rico?
- Puerto Rico, at 230 t against 150 t in Dominica as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled between Dominica and Puerto Rico?
- 80 t, with Puerto Rico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominica and Puerto Rico?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Dominica and Puerto Rico rank globally for nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled?
- Dominica ranks 173rd and Puerto Rico ranks 170th of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use with 115 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.