Estonia vs Melanesia: Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled
Estonia
6,592 t
in 2024
Melanesia
6,096 t
in 2024
Estonia rank
114th
Melanesia rank
116th
Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled over time
- Estonia
- Melanesia
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 6,592 t against 6,096 t in Melanesia, a difference of 496 t.
That makes Estonia's figure about 1.1 times Melanesia's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Estonia ahead.
Estonia ranks 114th and Melanesia ranks 116th of 212 countries.
Estonia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Melanesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 7,750 t | 6,825 t | 925 t | Estonia |
| 2000s | 6,574 t | 3,490 t | 3,084 t | Estonia |
| 2010s | 7,869 t | 3,515 t | 4,353 t | Estonia |
| 2020s | 8,912 t | 5,468 t | 3,444 t | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled, Estonia or Melanesia?
- Estonia, at 6,592 t against 6,096 t in Melanesia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled between Estonia and Melanesia?
- 496 t, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Melanesia?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Estonia and Melanesia rank globally for nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled?
- Estonia ranks 114th and Melanesia ranks 116th of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use with 115 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.