Jordan vs Tajikistan: Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled
Jordan
2,945 t
in 2024
Tajikistan
3,346 t
in 2024
Jordan rank
140th
Tajikistan rank
138th
Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled over time
- Jordan
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Tajikistan currently reports 3,346 t against 2,945 t in Jordan, a difference of 401 t.
That makes Tajikistan's figure about 1.1 times Jordan's.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Tajikistan ahead.
Jordan ranks 140th and Tajikistan ranks 138th of 212 countries.
Tajikistan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jordan | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 7,303 t | 22,677 t | 15,374 t | Tajikistan |
| 2000s | 5,626 t | 8,795 t | 3,169 t | Tajikistan |
| 2010s | 2,648 t | 2,671 t | 22.6 t | Tajikistan |
| 2020s | 1,923 t | 3,970 t | 2,048 t | Tajikistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled, Jordan or Tajikistan?
- Tajikistan, at 3,346 t against 2,945 t in Jordan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled between Jordan and Tajikistan?
- 401 t, with Tajikistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Tajikistan?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Jordan and Tajikistan rank globally for nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled?
- Jordan ranks 140th and Tajikistan ranks 138th of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use with 115 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.