Kazakhstan vs Libya: Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled
Kazakhstan
41,700 t
in 2024
Libya
44,004 t
in 2024
Kazakhstan rank
66th
Libya rank
65th
Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled over time
- Kazakhstan
- Libya
How they compare
Libya currently reports 44,004 t against 41,700 t in Kazakhstan, a difference of 2,304 t.
That makes Libya's figure about 1.1 times Kazakhstan's.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 66th and Libya ranks 65th of 212 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 3 and Libya in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 89,525 t | 46,600 t | 42,925 t | Kazakhstan |
| 2000s | 14,040 t | 22,996 t | 8,956 t | Libya |
| 2010s | 31,178 t | 25,172 t | 6,006 t | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 51,773 t | 21,195 t | 30,578 t | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled, Kazakhstan or Libya?
- Libya, at 44,004 t against 41,700 t in Kazakhstan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled between Kazakhstan and Libya?
- 2,304 t, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Libya?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Kazakhstan and Libya rank globally for nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled?
- Kazakhstan ranks 66th and Libya ranks 65th of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use with 115 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.