Kazakhstan vs Portugal: Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled
Kazakhstan
41,700 t
in 2024
Portugal
39,075 t
in 2024
Kazakhstan rank
66th
Portugal rank
68th
Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled over time
- Kazakhstan
- Portugal
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 41,700 t against 39,075 t in Portugal, a difference of 2,625 t.
That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 1.1 times Portugal's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 66th and Portugal ranks 68th of 212 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 2 and Portugal in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Portugal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 89,525 t | 71,250 t | 18,275 t | Kazakhstan |
| 2000s | 14,040 t | 52,376 t | 38,336 t | Portugal |
| 2010s | 31,178 t | 39,388 t | 8,209 t | Portugal |
| 2020s | 51,773 t | 36,005 t | 15,768 t | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled, Kazakhstan or Portugal?
- Kazakhstan, at 41,700 t against 39,075 t in Portugal as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled between Kazakhstan and Portugal?
- 2,625 t, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Portugal?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Kazakhstan and Portugal rank globally for nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled?
- Kazakhstan ranks 66th and Portugal ranks 68th of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use with 115 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.