Kazakhstan vs Tunisia: Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled
Kazakhstan
41,700 t
in 2024
Tunisia
50,900 t
in 2024
Kazakhstan rank
66th
Tunisia rank
63rd
Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled over time
- Kazakhstan
- Tunisia
How they compare
Tunisia currently reports 50,900 t against 41,700 t in Kazakhstan, a difference of 9,200 t.
That makes Tunisia's figure about 1.2 times Kazakhstan's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 66th and Tunisia ranks 63rd of 212 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 2 and Tunisia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 89,525 t | 41,668 t | 47,856 t | Kazakhstan |
| 2000s | 14,040 t | 43,800 t | 29,760 t | Tunisia |
| 2010s | 31,178 t | 52,600 t | 21,422 t | Tunisia |
| 2020s | 51,773 t | 50,200 t | 1,573 t | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled, Kazakhstan or Tunisia?
- Tunisia, at 50,900 t against 41,700 t in Kazakhstan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled between Kazakhstan and Tunisia?
- 9,200 t, with Tunisia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Tunisia?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Kazakhstan and Tunisia rank globally for nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled?
- Kazakhstan ranks 66th and Tunisia ranks 63rd of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use with 115 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.