Lithuania vs Portugal: Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled
Lithuania
37,428 t
in 2024
Portugal
39,075 t
in 2024
Lithuania rank
71st
Portugal rank
68th
Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled over time
- Lithuania
- Portugal
How they compare
Portugal currently reports 39,075 t against 37,428 t in Lithuania, a difference of 1,647 t.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Portugal ahead.
Lithuania ranks 71st and Portugal ranks 68th of 212 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Lithuania averaged higher in 2 and Portugal in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Portugal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 18,200 t | 71,250 t | 53,050 t | Portugal |
| 2000s | 29,800 t | 52,376 t | 22,576 t | Portugal |
| 2010s | 45,092 t | 39,388 t | 5,704 t | Lithuania |
| 2020s | 44,586 t | 36,005 t | 8,581 t | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled, Lithuania or Portugal?
- Portugal, at 39,075 t against 37,428 t in Lithuania as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled between Lithuania and Portugal?
- 1,647 t, with Portugal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Portugal?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Lithuania and Portugal rank globally for nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled?
- Lithuania ranks 71st and Portugal ranks 68th of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use with 115 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.