Lithuania vs Sweden: Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled
Lithuania
37,428 t
in 2024
Sweden
35,066 t
in 2024
Lithuania rank
71st
Sweden rank
73rd
Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled over time
- Lithuania
- Sweden
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 37,428 t against 35,066 t in Sweden, a difference of 2,362 t.
That makes Lithuania's figure about 1.1 times Sweden's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Sweden ahead.
Lithuania ranks 71st and Sweden ranks 73rd of 212 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Lithuania averaged higher in 2 and Sweden in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 18,200 t | 48,543 t | 30,343 t | Sweden |
| 2000s | 29,800 t | 33,094 t | 3,294 t | Sweden |
| 2010s | 45,092 t | 27,889 t | 17,203 t | Lithuania |
| 2020s | 44,586 t | 38,621 t | 5,964 t | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled, Lithuania or Sweden?
- Lithuania, at 37,428 t against 35,066 t in Sweden as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled between Lithuania and Sweden?
- 2,362 t, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Sweden?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Lithuania and Sweden rank globally for nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled?
- Lithuania ranks 71st and Sweden ranks 73rd of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use with 115 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.