Malawi vs Uzbekistan: Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled
Malawi
22,789 t
in 2024
Uzbekistan
20,373 t
in 2024
Malawi rank
88th
Uzbekistan rank
89th
Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled over time
- Malawi
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 22,789 t against 20,373 t in Uzbekistan, a difference of 2,416 t.
That makes Malawi's figure about 1.1 times Uzbekistan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Uzbekistan ahead.
Malawi ranks 88th and Uzbekistan ranks 89th of 212 countries.
Uzbekistan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 13,492 t | 164,188 t | 150,695 t | Uzbekistan |
| 2000s | 18,141 t | 136,987 t | 118,847 t | Uzbekistan |
| 2010s | 19,385 t | 192,844 t | 173,459 t | Uzbekistan |
| 2020s | 27,557 t | 86,994 t | 59,437 t | Uzbekistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled, Malawi or Uzbekistan?
- Malawi, at 22,789 t against 20,373 t in Uzbekistan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled between Malawi and Uzbekistan?
- 2,416 t, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Uzbekistan?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Malawi and Uzbekistan rank globally for nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled?
- Malawi ranks 88th and Uzbekistan ranks 89th of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use with 115 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.