Malta vs Namibia: Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled
Malta
662 t
in 2024
Namibia
559 t
in 2024
Malta rank
160th
Namibia rank
163rd
Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled over time
- Malta
- Namibia
How they compare
Malta currently reports 662 t against 559 t in Namibia, a difference of 103 t.
That makes Malta's figure about 1.2 times Namibia's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1999 it was Namibia ahead.
Malta ranks 160th and Namibia ranks 163rd of 212 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Malta averaged higher in 1 and Namibia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malta | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 131 t | 200 t | 69 t | Namibia |
| 2000s | 144.8 t | 192.7 t | 47.9 t | Namibia |
| 2010s | 93.6 t | 744.6 t | 651 t | Namibia |
| 2020s | 328.6 t | 270.4 t | 58.2 t | Malta |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled, Malta or Namibia?
- Malta, at 662 t against 559 t in Namibia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled between Malta and Namibia?
- 103 t, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Namibia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2024.
- How do Malta and Namibia rank globally for nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled?
- Malta ranks 160th and Namibia ranks 163rd of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use with 115 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.