Nepal vs Sweden: Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled
Nepal
35,751 t
in 2024
Sweden
35,066 t
in 2024
Nepal rank
72nd
Sweden rank
73rd
Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled over time
- Nepal
- Sweden
How they compare
Nepal currently reports 35,751 t against 35,066 t in Sweden, a difference of 685 t.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1963 it was Sweden ahead.
Nepal ranks 72nd and Sweden ranks 73rd of 212 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Nepal averaged higher in 2 and Sweden in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nepal | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 534.57 t | 125,270 t | 124,736 t | Sweden |
| 1970s | 2,642 t | 143,571 t | 140,928 t | Sweden |
| 1980s | 10,697 t | 94,953 t | 84,256 t | Sweden |
| 1990s | 24,260 t | 49,224 t | 24,963 t | Sweden |
| 2000s | 9,432 t | 33,094 t | 23,662 t | Sweden |
| 2010s | 35,524 t | 27,889 t | 7,636 t | Nepal |
| 2020s | 49,168 t | 38,621 t | 10,547 t | Nepal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled, Nepal or Sweden?
- Nepal, at 35,751 t against 35,066 t in Sweden as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled between Nepal and Sweden?
- 685 t, with Nepal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nepal and Sweden?
- 62 years are reported by both, from 1963 to 2024.
- How do Nepal and Sweden rank globally for nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled?
- Nepal ranks 72nd and Sweden ranks 73rd of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use with 115 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.