Peru vs Zambia: Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled
Peru
60,479 t
in 2024
Zambia
62,195 t
in 2024
Peru rank
56th
Zambia rank
55th
Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled over time
- Peru
- Zambia
How they compare
Zambia currently reports 62,195 t against 60,479 t in Peru, a difference of 1,716 t.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Peru ahead.
Peru ranks 56th and Zambia ranks 55th of 212 countries.
Peru has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Peru | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 17,678 t | 3,739 t | 13,939 t | Peru |
| 1970s | 13,722 t | 13,419 t | 303 t | Peru |
| 1980s | 23,444 t | 19,450 t | 3,994 t | Peru |
| 1990s | 28,073 t | 14,959 t | 13,114 t | Peru |
| 2000s | 66,581 t | 10,458 t | 56,123 t | Peru |
| 2010s | 83,766 t | 33,126 t | 50,640 t | Peru |
| 2020s | 67,871 t | 48,313 t | 19,558 t | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled, Peru or Zambia?
- Zambia, at 62,195 t against 60,479 t in Peru as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled between Peru and Zambia?
- 1,716 t, with Zambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and Zambia?
- 64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
- How do Peru and Zambia rank globally for nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled?
- Peru ranks 56th and Zambia ranks 55th of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use with 115 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.