Republic of Korea vs Serbia: Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled
Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled over time
- Republic of Korea
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 78,913 t against 75,121 t in Republic of Korea, a difference of 3,792 t.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.1 times Republic of Korea's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Republic of Korea ahead.
Republic of Korea ranks 48th and Serbia ranks 45th of 212 countries.
Republic of Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Republic of Korea | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 115,750 t | 80,100 t | 35,650 t | Republic of Korea |
| 2010s | 141,200 t | 66,845 t | 74,355 t | Republic of Korea |
| 2020s | 81,294 t | 72,910 t | 8,384 t | Republic of Korea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled, Republic of Korea or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 78,913 t against 75,121 t in Republic of Korea as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled between Republic of Korea and Serbia?
- 3,792 t, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Republic of Korea and Serbia?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
- How do Republic of Korea and Serbia rank globally for nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled?
- Republic of Korea ranks 48th and Serbia ranks 45th of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use with 115 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.