Congo vs Qatar: Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use, per capita
Congo
0.0004 t per person
in 2024
Qatar
0.0004 t per person
in 2024
Congo rank
123rd
Qatar rank
120th
Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use, per capita over time
- Congo
- Qatar
How they compare
Qatar currently reports 0.0004 t per person against 0.0004 t per person in Congo, a difference of 0 t per person.
That makes Qatar's figure about 1.1 times Congo's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Congo ahead.
Congo ranks 123rd and Qatar ranks 120th of 173 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 1 and Qatar in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Qatar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 t per person | 0 t per person | 0 t per person | Congo |
| 2010s | 0.0001 t per person | 0.0002 t per person | 0.0002 t per person | Qatar |
| 2020s | 0.0002 t per person | 0.0004 t per person | 0.0002 t per person | Qatar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — agricultural use, per capita, Congo or Qatar?
- Qatar, at 0.0004 t per person against 0.0004 t per person in Congo as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — agricultural use, per capita between Congo and Qatar?
- 0 t per person, with Qatar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Qatar?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2024.
- How do Congo and Qatar rank globally for nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — agricultural use, per capita?
- Congo ranks 123rd and Qatar ranks 120th of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.