Mozambique vs Sudan: Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use, per capita
Mozambique
0.0006 t per person
in 2024
Sudan
0.0005 t per person
in 2024
Mozambique rank
109th
Sudan rank
112th
Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use, per capita over time
- Mozambique
- Sudan
How they compare
Mozambique currently reports 0.0006 t per person against 0.0005 t per person in Sudan, a difference of 0.0001 t per person.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Sudan ahead.
Mozambique ranks 109th and Sudan ranks 112th of 173 countries.
Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mozambique | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0002 t per person | 0.0004 t per person | 0.0002 t per person | Sudan |
| 2020s | 0.0003 t per person | 0.0006 t per person | 0.0003 t per person | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — agricultural use, per capita, Mozambique or Sudan?
- Mozambique, at 0.0006 t per person against 0.0005 t per person in Sudan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — agricultural use, per capita between Mozambique and Sudan?
- 0.0001 t per person, with Mozambique ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mozambique and Sudan?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2024.
- How do Mozambique and Sudan rank globally for nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — agricultural use, per capita?
- Mozambique ranks 109th and Sudan ranks 112th of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.