Singapore vs South Sudan: Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use, per capita
Singapore
0 t per person
in 2024
South Sudan
0 t per person
in 2024
Singapore rank
165th
South Sudan rank
166th
Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use, per capita over time
- Singapore
- South Sudan
How they compare
Singapore currently reports 0 t per person against 0 t per person in South Sudan, a difference of 0 t per person.
That makes Singapore's figure about 2.6 times South Sudan's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Singapore ahead.
Singapore ranks 165th and South Sudan ranks 166th of 173 countries.
Singapore has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Singapore | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 t per person | 0 t per person | 0 t per person | Singapore |
| 2020s | 0 t per person | 0 t per person | 0 t per person | Singapore |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — agricultural use, per capita, Singapore or South Sudan?
- Singapore, at 0 t per person against 0 t per person in South Sudan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — agricultural use, per capita between Singapore and South Sudan?
- 0 t per person, with Singapore ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Singapore and South Sudan?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2024.
- How do Singapore and South Sudan rank globally for nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — agricultural use, per capita?
- Singapore ranks 165th and South Sudan ranks 166th of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.