Barbados vs Chile: Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use, per square

Barbados
0.1163 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile
0.1345 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Barbados rank
85th
Chile rank
83rd

Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use, per square over time

  • Barbados
  • Chile
0123196119922023

How they compare

Chile currently reports 0.1345 t per square kilometre against 0.1163 t per square kilometre in Barbados, a difference of 0.0182 t per square kilometre.

That makes Chile's figure about 1.2 times Barbados's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Chile ahead.

Barbados ranks 85th and Chile ranks 83rd of 173 countries.

Barbados has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados Chile Difference Ahead
1960s 0.5424 t per square kilometre 0.0614 t per square kilometre 0.4809 t per square kilometre Barbados
1970s 1.56 t per square kilometre 0.0917 t per square kilometre 1.47 t per square kilometre Barbados
1980s 2.02 t per square kilometre 0.116 t per square kilometre 1.91 t per square kilometre Barbados
1990s 0.4651 t per square kilometre 0.1902 t per square kilometre 0.2749 t per square kilometre Barbados
2000s 0.6421 t per square kilometre 0.1999 t per square kilometre 0.4422 t per square kilometre Barbados
2010s 0.6935 t per square kilometre 0.1752 t per square kilometre 0.5183 t per square kilometre Barbados
2020s 0.2471 t per square kilometre 0.1549 t per square kilometre 0.0922 t per square kilometre Barbados

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — agricultural use, per square, Barbados or Chile?
Chile, at 0.1345 t per square kilometre against 0.1163 t per square kilometre in Barbados as of 2023.
What is the difference in nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — agricultural use, per square between Barbados and Chile?
0.0182 t per square kilometre, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Chile?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Barbados and Chile rank globally for nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — agricultural use, per square?
Barbados ranks 85th and Chile ranks 83rd of 173 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs Chile: Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-phosphate-p2o5-total-agricultural-use-per-square-kilometre/barbados/chile/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-phosphate-p2o5-total-agricultural-use-per-square-kilometre/barbados/chile/">Barbados vs Chile: Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
174 places, 8,631 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.