Congo vs Mauritania: Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use, per square

Congo
0.0029 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritania
0.0009 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo rank
154th
Mauritania rank
157th

Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use, per square over time

  • Congo
  • Mauritania
00.0010.0020.003196619942023

How they compare

Congo currently reports 0.0029 t per square kilometre against 0.0009 t per square kilometre in Mauritania, a difference of 0.002 t per square kilometre.

That makes Congo's figure about 3.3 times Mauritania's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1973 it was Congo ahead.

Congo ranks 154th and Mauritania ranks 157th of 173 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 3 and Mauritania in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Mauritania Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0007 t per square kilometre 0 t per square kilometre 0.0006 t per square kilometre Congo
1980s 0.0005 t per square kilometre 0.0006 t per square kilometre 0.0001 t per square kilometre Mauritania
1990s 0.0021 t per square kilometre 0.0003 t per square kilometre 0.0018 t per square kilometre Congo
2000s 0.0005 t per square kilometre 0.0005 t per square kilometre 0 t per square kilometre Mauritania
2010s 0.0007 t per square kilometre 0.0009 t per square kilometre 0.0002 t per square kilometre Mauritania
2020s 0.0026 t per square kilometre 0.0011 t per square kilometre 0.0016 t per square kilometre Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — agricultural use, per square, Congo or Mauritania?
Congo, at 0.0029 t per square kilometre against 0.0009 t per square kilometre in Mauritania as of 2023.
What is the difference in nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — agricultural use, per square between Congo and Mauritania?
0.002 t per square kilometre, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Mauritania?
27 years are reported by both, from 1973 to 2023.
How do Congo and Mauritania rank globally for nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — agricultural use, per square?
Congo ranks 154th and Mauritania ranks 157th of 173 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Mauritania: Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-phosphate-p2o5-total-agricultural-use-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/mauritania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-phosphate-p2o5-total-agricultural-use-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/mauritania/">Congo vs Mauritania: Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
174 places, 8,631 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.