Eritrea vs Gambia: Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use, per unit of GDP
Eritrea
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2009
Gambia
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Eritrea rank
32nd
Gambia rank
35th
Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use, per unit of GDP over time
- Eritrea
- Gambia
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Gambia, a difference of 0 t per US$ of GDP.
That makes Eritrea's figure about 1.1 times Gambia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 12 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Gambia ahead.
Eritrea ranks 32nd and Gambia ranks 35th of 172 countries.
Eritrea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Gambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Eritrea |
| 2000s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Eritrea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — agricultural use, per unit of gdp, Eritrea or Gambia?
- Eritrea, at 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Gambia as of 2009.
- What is the difference in nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — agricultural use, per unit of gdp between Eritrea and Gambia?
- 0 t per US$ of GDP, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Gambia?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2009.
- How do Eritrea and Gambia rank globally for nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — agricultural use, per unit of gdp?
- Eritrea ranks 32nd and Gambia ranks 35th of 172 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.