Kyrgyzstan vs Sudan: Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use, per unit of GDP
Kyrgyzstan
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Sudan
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Kyrgyzstan rank
46th
Sudan rank
45th
Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use, per unit of GDP over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Sudan
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 0 t per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Sudan ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 46th and Sudan ranks 45th of 172 countries.
Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Sudan |
| 2020s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — agricultural use, per unit of gdp, Kyrgyzstan or Sudan?
- Sudan, at 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Kyrgyzstan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — agricultural use, per unit of gdp between Kyrgyzstan and Sudan?
- 0 t per US$ of GDP, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Sudan?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2024.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Sudan rank globally for nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — agricultural use, per unit of gdp?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 46th and Sudan ranks 45th of 172 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.