Hungary vs Serbia: Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use
Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use over time
- Hungary
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 78,913 t against 77,243 t in Hungary, a difference of 1,670 t.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Hungary ahead.
Hungary ranks 46th and Serbia ranks 44th of 210 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Hungary averaged higher in 2 and Serbia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hungary | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 65,888 t | 80,100 t | 14,212 t | Serbia |
| 2010s | 83,370 t | 66,845 t | 16,524 t | Hungary |
| 2020s | 84,706 t | 72,910 t | 11,796 t | Hungary |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — agricultural use, Hungary or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 78,913 t against 77,243 t in Hungary as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — agricultural use between Hungary and Serbia?
- 1,670 t, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Serbia?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
- How do Hungary and Serbia rank globally for nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — agricultural use?
- Hungary ranks 46th and Serbia ranks 44th of 210 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Nutrient dataset contains information on the totals in nutrients for Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers. The data are provided for the three primary plant nutrients: nitrogen (N), phosphorus (expressed as P2O5) and potassium (expressed as K2O). Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFN/RFN_EN_README.pdf