Italy vs Serbia: Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use
Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use over time
- Italy
- Serbia
How they compare
Italy currently reports 98,699 t against 78,913 t in Serbia, a difference of 19,786 t.
That makes Italy's figure about 1.3 times Serbia's.
Across all 19 years both countries report, Italy has been ahead every year.
Italy ranks 39th and Serbia ranks 42nd of 194 countries.
Italy has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Italy | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 230,504 t | 80,100 t | 150,404 t | Italy |
| 2010s | 172,279 t | 66,845 t | 105,434 t | Italy |
| 2020s | 124,327 t | 72,910 t | 51,417 t | Italy |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — agricultural use, Italy or Serbia?
- Italy, at 98,699 t against 78,913 t in Serbia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — agricultural use between Italy and Serbia?
- 19,786 t, with Italy ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Italy and Serbia?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
- How do Italy and Serbia rank globally for nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — agricultural use?
- Italy ranks 39th and Serbia ranks 42nd of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Nutrient dataset contains information on the totals in nutrients for Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers. The data are provided for the three primary plant nutrients: nitrogen (N), phosphorus (expressed as P2O5) and potassium (expressed as K2O). Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFN/RFN_EN_README.pdf