Bahamas vs Sri Lanka: Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Export quantity, annual growth rate
Bahamas
-100 % change on previous year
in 2008
Sri Lanka
-100 % change on previous year
in 2024
Bahamas rank
119th
Sri Lanka rank
119th
Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Export quantity, annual growth rate over time
- Bahamas
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Bahamas currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Sri Lanka has been ahead every year.
Bahamas ranks 119th and Sri Lanka ranks 119th of 150 countries.
Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — export quantity, annual growth rate, Bahamas or Sri Lanka?
- Bahamas, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Sri Lanka as of 2008.
- What is the difference in nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — export quantity, annual growth rate between Bahamas and Sri Lanka?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Bahamas ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Sri Lanka?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2008.
- How do Bahamas and Sri Lanka rank globally for nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — export quantity, annual growth rate?
- Bahamas ranks 119th and Sri Lanka ranks 119th of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Export quantity, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Export quantity. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.