Austria vs Costa Rica: Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Export quantity, gaps filled
Austria
2,867 t
in 2024
Costa Rica
3,164 t
in 2024
Austria rank
75th
Costa Rica rank
74th
Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Export quantity, gaps filled over time
- Austria
- Costa Rica
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 3,164 t against 2,867 t in Austria, a difference of 297 t.
That makes Costa Rica's figure about 1.1 times Austria's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Austria ahead.
Austria ranks 75th and Costa Rica ranks 74th of 217 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Austria averaged higher in 3 and Costa Rica in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Costa Rica | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 24,900 t | 1,996 t | 22,904 t | Austria |
| 2000s | 18,843 t | 1,243 t | 17,600 t | Austria |
| 2010s | 3,201 t | 2,782 t | 418.5 t | Austria |
| 2020s | 2,461 t | 2,949 t | 487.6 t | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — export quantity, gaps filled, Austria or Costa Rica?
- Costa Rica, at 3,164 t against 2,867 t in Austria as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — export quantity, gaps filled between Austria and Costa Rica?
- 297 t, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Costa Rica?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Austria and Costa Rica rank globally for nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — export quantity, gaps filled?
- Austria ranks 75th and Costa Rica ranks 74th of 217 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Export quantity, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Export quantity with 81 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.