Brazil vs Serbia: Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Export quantity, gaps filled
Brazil
59,753 t
in 2024
Serbia
59,239 t
in 2024
Brazil rank
32nd
Serbia rank
33rd
Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Export quantity, gaps filled over time
- Brazil
- Serbia
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 59,753 t against 59,239 t in Serbia, a difference of 514 t.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 32nd and Serbia ranks 33rd of 217 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 2 and Serbia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 140,239 t | 6,777 t | 133,462 t | Brazil |
| 2010s | 93,116 t | 28,665 t | 64,452 t | Brazil |
| 2020s | 50,225 t | 65,180 t | 14,955 t | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — export quantity, gaps filled, Brazil or Serbia?
- Brazil, at 59,753 t against 59,239 t in Serbia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — export quantity, gaps filled between Brazil and Serbia?
- 514 t, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Serbia?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
- How do Brazil and Serbia rank globally for nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — export quantity, gaps filled?
- Brazil ranks 32nd and Serbia ranks 33rd of 217 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Export quantity, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Export quantity with 81 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.