Costa Rica vs El Salvador: Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Export quantity, gaps filled
Costa Rica
3,164 t
in 2024
El Salvador
3,178 t
in 2024
Costa Rica rank
74th
El Salvador rank
73rd
Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Export quantity, gaps filled over time
- Costa Rica
- El Salvador
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 3,178 t against 3,164 t in Costa Rica, a difference of 14 t.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was El Salvador ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 74th and El Salvador ranks 73rd of 217 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 1 and El Salvador in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | El Salvador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1,996 t | 44 t | 1,952 t | Costa Rica |
| 2000s | 1,243 t | 2,265 t | 1,022 t | El Salvador |
| 2010s | 2,782 t | 5,069 t | 2,287 t | El Salvador |
| 2020s | 2,949 t | 4,502 t | 1,553 t | El Salvador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — export quantity, gaps filled, Costa Rica or El Salvador?
- El Salvador, at 3,178 t against 3,164 t in Costa Rica as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — export quantity, gaps filled between Costa Rica and El Salvador?
- 14 t, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and El Salvador?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Costa Rica and El Salvador rank globally for nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — export quantity, gaps filled?
- Costa Rica ranks 74th and El Salvador ranks 73rd of 217 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Export quantity, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Export quantity with 81 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.