Barbados vs Cabo Verde: Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Import quantity, gaps filled
Barbados
40 t
in 2024
Cabo Verde
41 t
in 2024
Barbados rank
191st
Cabo Verde rank
190th
Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Import quantity, gaps filled over time
- Barbados
- Cabo Verde
How they compare
Cabo Verde currently reports 41 t against 40 t in Barbados, a difference of 1 t.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 48 shared years of data; in 1973 it was Barbados ahead.
Barbados ranks 191st and Cabo Verde ranks 190th of 217 countries.
Barbados has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Barbados | Cabo Verde | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 729.86 t | 17.43 t | 712.43 t | Barbados |
| 1980s | 713.67 t | 20.67 t | 693 t | Barbados |
| 1990s | 200 t | 4.9 t | 195.1 t | Barbados |
| 2000s | 283.4 t | 20.6 t | 262.8 t | Barbados |
| 2010s | 316.9 t | 22 t | 294.9 t | Barbados |
| 2020s | 93 t | 26.2 t | 66.8 t | Barbados |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — import quantity, gaps filled, Barbados or Cabo Verde?
- Cabo Verde, at 41 t against 40 t in Barbados as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — import quantity, gaps filled between Barbados and Cabo Verde?
- 1 t, with Cabo Verde ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Cabo Verde?
- 48 years are reported by both, from 1973 to 2024.
- How do Barbados and Cabo Verde rank globally for nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — import quantity, gaps filled?
- Barbados ranks 191st and Cabo Verde ranks 190th of 217 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Import quantity, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Import quantity with 117 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.