Costa Rica vs Namibia: Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Import quantity, gaps filled
Costa Rica
27,141 t
in 2024
Namibia
33,811 t
in 2024
Costa Rica rank
76th
Namibia rank
74th
Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Import quantity, gaps filled over time
- Costa Rica
- Namibia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 33,811 t against 27,141 t in Costa Rica, a difference of 6,670 t.
That makes Namibia's figure about 1.2 times Costa Rica's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 76th and Namibia ranks 74th of 217 countries.
Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 23,672 t | 248.6 t | 23,423 t | Costa Rica |
| 2000s | 24,423 t | 341.5 t | 24,082 t | Costa Rica |
| 2010s | 21,266 t | 701.9 t | 20,564 t | Costa Rica |
| 2020s | 21,618 t | 10,237 t | 11,381 t | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — import quantity, gaps filled, Costa Rica or Namibia?
- Namibia, at 33,811 t against 27,141 t in Costa Rica as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — import quantity, gaps filled between Costa Rica and Namibia?
- 6,670 t, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Namibia?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Costa Rica and Namibia rank globally for nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — import quantity, gaps filled?
- Costa Rica ranks 76th and Namibia ranks 74th of 217 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Import quantity, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Import quantity with 117 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.