Croatia vs Uzbekistan: Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Import quantity, gaps filled
Croatia
39,101 t
in 2024
Uzbekistan
35,063 t
in 2024
Croatia rank
71st
Uzbekistan rank
73rd
Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Import quantity, gaps filled over time
- Croatia
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Croatia currently reports 39,101 t against 35,063 t in Uzbekistan, a difference of 4,038 t.
That makes Croatia's figure about 1.1 times Uzbekistan's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Croatia ahead.
Croatia ranks 71st and Uzbekistan ranks 73rd of 217 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Croatia averaged higher in 3 and Uzbekistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 10,690 t | 0 t | 10,690 t | Croatia |
| 2000s | 18,362 t | 81.2 t | 18,280 t | Croatia |
| 2010s | 57,964 t | 3,243 t | 54,721 t | Croatia |
| 2020s | 37,649 t | 39,918 t | 2,269 t | Uzbekistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — import quantity, gaps filled, Croatia or Uzbekistan?
- Croatia, at 39,101 t against 35,063 t in Uzbekistan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — import quantity, gaps filled between Croatia and Uzbekistan?
- 4,038 t, with Croatia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Uzbekistan?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Croatia and Uzbekistan rank globally for nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — import quantity, gaps filled?
- Croatia ranks 71st and Uzbekistan ranks 73rd of 217 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Import quantity, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Import quantity with 117 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.