El Salvador vs Estonia: Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Import quantity, gaps filled
El Salvador
12,935 t
in 2024
Estonia
12,842 t
in 2024
El Salvador rank
101st
Estonia rank
102nd
Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Import quantity, gaps filled over time
- El Salvador
- Estonia
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 12,935 t against 12,842 t in Estonia, a difference of 93 t.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was El Salvador ahead.
El Salvador ranks 101st and Estonia ranks 102nd of 217 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 1 and Estonia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Estonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 15,762 t | 3,067 t | 12,695 t | El Salvador |
| 2000s | 14,577 t | 29,110 t | 14,533 t | Estonia |
| 2010s | 17,767 t | 38,095 t | 20,328 t | Estonia |
| 2020s | 14,619 t | 32,091 t | 17,472 t | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — import quantity, gaps filled, El Salvador or Estonia?
- El Salvador, at 12,935 t against 12,842 t in Estonia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — import quantity, gaps filled between El Salvador and Estonia?
- 93 t, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Estonia?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do El Salvador and Estonia rank globally for nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — import quantity, gaps filled?
- El Salvador ranks 101st and Estonia ranks 102nd of 217 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Import quantity, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Import quantity with 117 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.