Portugal vs Serbia and Montenegro: Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Import quantity, gaps filled
Portugal
49,254 t
in 2024
Serbia and Montenegro
49,518 t
in 2005
Portugal rank
62nd
Serbia and Montenegro rank
61st
Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Import quantity, gaps filled over time
- Portugal
- Serbia and Montenegro
How they compare
Serbia and Montenegro currently reports 49,518 t against 49,254 t in Portugal, a difference of 264 t.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 14 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Serbia and Montenegro ahead.
Portugal ranks 62nd and Serbia and Montenegro ranks 61st of 217 countries.
Portugal has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Portugal | Serbia and Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 26,750 t | 17,171 t | 9,579 t | Portugal |
| 2000s | 37,376 t | 30,030 t | 7,346 t | Portugal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — import quantity, gaps filled, Portugal or Serbia and Montenegro?
- Serbia and Montenegro, at 49,518 t against 49,254 t in Portugal as of 2005.
- What is the difference in nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — import quantity, gaps filled between Portugal and Serbia and Montenegro?
- 264 t, with Serbia and Montenegro ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Portugal and Serbia and Montenegro?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2005.
- How do Portugal and Serbia and Montenegro rank globally for nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — import quantity, gaps filled?
- Portugal ranks 62nd and Serbia and Montenegro ranks 61st of 217 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Import quantity, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Import quantity with 117 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.