Serbia and Montenegro vs Zambia: Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Import quantity, gaps filled
Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Import quantity, gaps filled over time
- Serbia and Montenegro
- Zambia
How they compare
Zambia currently reports 52,326 t against 49,518 t in Serbia and Montenegro, a difference of 2,808 t.
That makes Zambia's figure about 1.1 times Serbia and Montenegro's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 14 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Serbia and Montenegro ahead.
Serbia and Montenegro ranks 61st and Zambia ranks 59th of 217 countries.
Serbia and Montenegro has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Serbia and Montenegro | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 17,171 t | 14,786 t | 2,385 t | Serbia and Montenegro |
| 2000s | 30,030 t | 12,274 t | 17,756 t | Serbia and Montenegro |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — import quantity, gaps filled, Serbia and Montenegro or Zambia?
- Zambia, at 52,326 t against 49,518 t in Serbia and Montenegro as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — import quantity, gaps filled between Serbia and Montenegro and Zambia?
- 2,808 t, with Zambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Montenegro and Zambia?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2005.
- How do Serbia and Montenegro and Zambia rank globally for nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — import quantity, gaps filled?
- Serbia and Montenegro ranks 61st and Zambia ranks 59th of 217 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Import quantity, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Import quantity with 117 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.