Serbia vs Zambia: Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Import quantity, gaps filled
Serbia
53,450 t
in 2024
Zambia
52,326 t
in 2023
Serbia rank
58th
Zambia rank
59th
Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Import quantity, gaps filled over time
- Serbia
- Zambia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 53,450 t against 52,326 t in Zambia, a difference of 1,124 t.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Serbia ahead.
Serbia ranks 58th and Zambia ranks 59th of 217 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Serbia | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 58,358 t | 8,062 t | 50,296 t | Serbia |
| 2010s | 54,526 t | 38,282 t | 16,244 t | Serbia |
| 2020s | 57,144 t | 45,488 t | 11,656 t | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — import quantity, gaps filled, Serbia or Zambia?
- Serbia, at 53,450 t against 52,326 t in Zambia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — import quantity, gaps filled between Serbia and Zambia?
- 1,124 t, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Zambia?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Serbia and Zambia rank globally for nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — import quantity, gaps filled?
- Serbia ranks 58th and Zambia ranks 59th of 217 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Import quantity, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Import quantity with 117 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.