Jordan vs Trinidad and Tobago: Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Import quantity, per square

Jordan
0.2066 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Trinidad and Tobago
0.1949 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Jordan rank
66th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
69th

Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Import quantity, per square over time

  • Jordan
  • Trinidad and Tobago
00.20.40.6196119922023

How they compare

Jordan currently reports 0.2066 t per square kilometre against 0.1949 t per square kilometre in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 0.0117 t per square kilometre.

That makes Jordan's figure about 1.1 times Trinidad and Tobago's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Trinidad and Tobago ahead.

Jordan ranks 66th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 69th of 173 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Jordan averaged higher in 1 and Trinidad and Tobago in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Jordan Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0076 t per square kilometre 0.1134 t per square kilometre 0.1058 t per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1970s 0.0226 t per square kilometre 0.0909 t per square kilometre 0.0683 t per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1980s 0.0521 t per square kilometre 0.2056 t per square kilometre 0.1535 t per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1990s 0.0245 t per square kilometre 0.1345 t per square kilometre 0.11 t per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2000s 0.019 t per square kilometre 0.1042 t per square kilometre 0.0851 t per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2010s 0.0497 t per square kilometre 0.0577 t per square kilometre 0.008 t per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2020s 0.1081 t per square kilometre 0.092 t per square kilometre 0.0161 t per square kilometre Jordan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — import quantity, per square, Jordan or Trinidad and Tobago?
Jordan, at 0.2066 t per square kilometre against 0.1949 t per square kilometre in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2023.
What is the difference in nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — import quantity, per square between Jordan and Trinidad and Tobago?
0.0117 t per square kilometre, with Jordan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Trinidad and Tobago?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Jordan and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — import quantity, per square?
Jordan ranks 66th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 69th of 173 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Import quantity, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Jordan vs Trinidad and Tobago: Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Import quantity, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-phosphate-p2o5-total-import-quantity-per-square-kilometre/jordan/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-phosphate-p2o5-total-import-quantity-per-square-kilometre/jordan/trinidad-and-tobago/">Jordan vs Trinidad and Tobago: Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Import quantity, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Import quantity, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
174 places, 8,866 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Import quantity divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.