Norway vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Import quantity, per square

Norway
0.0341 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Saint Kitts and Nevis
0.0346 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Norway rank
112th
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
111th

Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Import quantity, per square over time

  • Norway
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
01234196119922023

How they compare

Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 0.0346 t per square kilometre against 0.0341 t per square kilometre in Norway, a difference of 0.0005 t per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.

Norway ranks 112th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 111th of 173 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Norway averaged higher in 1 and Saint Kitts and Nevis in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Norway Saint Kitts and Nevis Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0131 t per square kilometre 0.3063 t per square kilometre 0.2933 t per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
1970s 0.0029 t per square kilometre 1.14 t per square kilometre 1.14 t per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
1980s 0.0081 t per square kilometre 2.83 t per square kilometre 2.82 t per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
1990s 0.0109 t per square kilometre 1.47 t per square kilometre 1.46 t per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
2000s 0.0232 t per square kilometre 0.5512 t per square kilometre 0.5279 t per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
2010s 0.0334 t per square kilometre 0.0527 t per square kilometre 0.0193 t per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
2020s 0.0531 t per square kilometre 0.0346 t per square kilometre 0.0185 t per square kilometre Norway

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — import quantity, per square, Norway or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 0.0346 t per square kilometre against 0.0341 t per square kilometre in Norway as of 2023.
What is the difference in nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — import quantity, per square between Norway and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
0.0005 t per square kilometre, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Norway and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Norway and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — import quantity, per square?
Norway ranks 112th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 111th of 173 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Import quantity, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Norway vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Import quantity, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-phosphate-p2o5-total-import-quantity-per-square-kilometre/norway/st-kitts-and-nevis/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-phosphate-p2o5-total-import-quantity-per-square-kilometre/norway/st-kitts-and-nevis/">Norway vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Import quantity, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Import quantity, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
174 places, 8,866 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Import quantity divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.