Canada vs China, Hong Kong SAR: Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Production
Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Production over time
- Canada
- China, Hong Kong SAR
How they compare
Canada currently reports 0 t against 0 t in China, Hong Kong SAR, a difference of 0 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2013 it was Canada ahead.
Canada ranks 58th and China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 58th of 189 countries.
Canada has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Canada | China, Hong Kong SAR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 262,471 t | 0 t | 262,471 t | Canada |
| 2020s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — production, Canada or China, Hong Kong SAR?
- Canada, at 0 t against 0 t in China, Hong Kong SAR as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — production between Canada and China, Hong Kong SAR?
- 0 t, with Canada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and China, Hong Kong SAR?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2024.
- How do Canada and China, Hong Kong SAR rank globally for nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — production?
- Canada ranks 58th and China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 58th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Production. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Nutrient dataset contains information on the totals in nutrients for Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers. The data are provided for the three primary plant nutrients: nitrogen (N), phosphorus (expressed as P2O5) and potassium (expressed as K2O). Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFN/RFN_EN_README.pdf