Chile vs Peru: Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Production
Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Production over time
- Chile
- Peru
How they compare
Chile currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Peru, a difference of 0 t.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 39 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Peru ahead.
Chile ranks 59th and Peru ranks 59th of 206 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 3 and Peru in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 7,060 t | 18,894 t | 11,833 t | Peru |
| 1970s | 19,833 t | 4,423 t | 15,410 t | Chile |
| 1980s | 3,785 t | 3,945 t | 160 t | Peru |
| 1990s | 4,571 t | 2,485 t | 2,086 t | Chile |
| 2000s | 138 t | 0 t | 138 t | Chile |
| 2010s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — production, Chile or Peru?
- Chile, at 0 t against 0 t in Peru as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — production between Chile and Peru?
- 0 t, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Peru?
- 39 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2018.
- How do Chile and Peru rank globally for nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — production?
- Chile ranks 59th and Peru ranks 59th of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Production. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Nutrient dataset contains information on the totals in nutrients for Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers. The data are provided for the three primary plant nutrients: nitrogen (N), phosphorus (expressed as P2O5) and potassium (expressed as K2O). Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFN/RFN_EN_README.pdf