Latvia vs Senegal: Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Production
Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Production over time
- Latvia
- Senegal
How they compare
Senegal currently reports 7,367 t against 0 t in Latvia, a difference of 7,367 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 59th and Senegal ranks 57th of 206 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 1 and Senegal in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Senegal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 60,000 t | 33,000 t | 27,000 t | Latvia |
| 2000s | 0 t | 16,688 t | 16,688 t | Senegal |
| 2010s | 0 t | 13,670 t | 13,670 t | Senegal |
| 2020s | 0 t | 7,366 t | 7,366 t | Senegal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — production, Latvia or Senegal?
- Senegal, at 7,367 t against 0 t in Latvia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — production between Latvia and Senegal?
- 7,367 t, with Senegal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Senegal?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2020.
- How do Latvia and Senegal rank globally for nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — production?
- Latvia ranks 59th and Senegal ranks 57th of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Production. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Nutrient dataset contains information on the totals in nutrients for Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers. The data are provided for the three primary plant nutrients: nitrogen (N), phosphorus (expressed as P2O5) and potassium (expressed as K2O). Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFN/RFN_EN_README.pdf