Sao Tome and Principe vs United Republic of Tanzania: Nutrient phosphate P2O5: Use per value of agricultural

Sao Tome and Principe
2.32 g/Int$
in 2024
United Republic of Tanzania
2.53 g/Int$
in 2024
Sao Tome and Principe rank
134th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
131st

Nutrient phosphate P2O5: Use per value of agricultural over time

  • Sao Tome and Principe
  • United Republic of Tanzania
012345196119922024

How they compare

United Republic of Tanzania currently reports 2.53 g/Int$ against 2.32 g/Int$ in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0.21 g/Int$.

That makes United Republic of Tanzania's figure about 1.1 times Sao Tome and Principe's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.

Sao Tome and Principe ranks 134th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 131st of 211 countries.

United Republic of Tanzania has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sao Tome and Principe United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
2000s 0.5663 g/Int$ 1.11 g/Int$ 0.5487 g/Int$ United Republic of Tanzania
2010s 0.845 g/Int$ 2.47 g/Int$ 1.62 g/Int$ United Republic of Tanzania
2020s 1.4 g/Int$ 2.92 g/Int$ 1.52 g/Int$ United Republic of Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — use per value of agricultural, Sao Tome and Principe or United Republic of Tanzania?
United Republic of Tanzania, at 2.53 g/Int$ against 2.32 g/Int$ in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2024.
What is the difference in nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — use per value of agricultural between Sao Tome and Principe and United Republic of Tanzania?
0.21 g/Int$, with United Republic of Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sao Tome and Principe and United Republic of Tanzania?
23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
How do Sao Tome and Principe and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) — use per value of agricultural?
Sao Tome and Principe ranks 134th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 131st of 211 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Use per value of agricultural production. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sao Tome and Principe vs United Republic of Tanzania: Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Use per value of agricultural. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 25 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-phosphate-p2o5-total-use-per-value-of-agricultural-production/sao-tome-and-principe/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-phosphate-p2o5-total-use-per-value-of-agricultural-production/sao-tome-and-principe/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Sao Tome and Principe vs United Republic of Tanzania: Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Use per value of agricultural</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nutrient phosphate P2O5 (total) — Use per value of agricultural production
Unit
g/Int$
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
241 places, 13,450 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

The Fertilizers by Nutrient dataset contains information on the totals in nutrients for Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers. The data are provided for the three primary plant nutrients: nitrogen (N), phosphorus (expressed as P2O5) and potassium (expressed as K2O). Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFN/RFN_EN_README.pdf