Aruba vs Eritrea: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, annual growth rate
Aruba
-100 % change on previous year
in 2024
Eritrea
-100 % change on previous year
in 2022
Aruba rank
194th
Eritrea rank
194th
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, annual growth rate over time
- Aruba
- Eritrea
How they compare
Aruba currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Eritrea, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Aruba has been ahead every year.
Aruba ranks 194th and Eritrea ranks 194th of 209 countries.
Aruba has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Eritrea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 20.22 % change on previous year | -75 % change on previous year | 95.22 % change on previous year | Aruba |
| 2020s | -47.06 % change on previous year | -100 % change on previous year | 52.94 % change on previous year | Aruba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, annual growth rate, Aruba or Eritrea?
- Aruba, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Eritrea as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, annual growth rate between Aruba and Eritrea?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Aruba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Eritrea?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2022.
- How do Aruba and Eritrea rank globally for nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, annual growth rate?
- Aruba ranks 194th and Eritrea ranks 194th of 209 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.