Australia and New Zealand vs Middle Africa: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, annual growth rate
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, annual growth rate over time
- Australia and New Zealand
- Middle Africa
How they compare
Australia and New Zealand currently reports 44.53 % change on previous year against -1.72 % change on previous year in Middle Africa, a difference of 46.25 % change on previous year.
That makes Australia and New Zealand's figure about 25.8 times Middle Africa's.
The two have swapped places 33 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Middle Africa ahead.
Australia and New Zealand ranks 24th and Middle Africa ranks 25th of 209 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 1 and Middle Africa in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia and New Zealand | Middle Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 5.64 % change on previous year | 25.71 % change on previous year | 20.07 % change on previous year | Middle Africa |
| 1970s | 4.56 % change on previous year | 10.87 % change on previous year | 6.31 % change on previous year | Middle Africa |
| 1980s | 1.54 % change on previous year | 1.48 % change on previous year | 0.0601 % change on previous year | Australia and New Zealand |
| 1990s | 3.27 % change on previous year | 4.31 % change on previous year | 1.04 % change on previous year | Middle Africa |
| 2000s | -2.28 % change on previous year | 4.66 % change on previous year | 6.94 % change on previous year | Middle Africa |
| 2010s | 5.67 % change on previous year | 9.47 % change on previous year | 3.8 % change on previous year | Middle Africa |
| 2020s | 7.93 % change on previous year | 12.61 % change on previous year | 4.69 % change on previous year | Middle Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, annual growth rate, Australia and New Zealand or Middle Africa?
- Australia and New Zealand, at 44.53 % change on previous year against -1.72 % change on previous year in Middle Africa as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, annual growth rate between Australia and New Zealand and Middle Africa?
- 46.25 % change on previous year, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Middle Africa?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2024.
- How do Australia and New Zealand and Middle Africa rank globally for nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, annual growth rate?
- Australia and New Zealand ranks 24th and Middle Africa ranks 25th of 209 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.