Brazil vs Georgia: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, annual growth rate
Brazil
7.06 % change on previous year
in 2024
Georgia
7.34 % change on previous year
in 2024
Brazil rank
67th
Georgia rank
66th
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, annual growth rate over time
- Brazil
- Georgia
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 7.34 % change on previous year against 7.06 % change on previous year in Brazil, a difference of 0.28 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 15 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 67th and Georgia ranks 66th of 209 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 1 and Georgia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Georgia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -0.7956 % change on previous year | 16.76 % change on previous year | 17.56 % change on previous year | Georgia |
| 2010s | 12.17 % change on previous year | 27.31 % change on previous year | 15.13 % change on previous year | Georgia |
| 2020s | 5.8 % change on previous year | 4.59 % change on previous year | 1.21 % change on previous year | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, annual growth rate, Brazil or Georgia?
- Georgia, at 7.34 % change on previous year against 7.06 % change on previous year in Brazil as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, annual growth rate between Brazil and Georgia?
- 0.28 % change on previous year, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Georgia?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Brazil and Georgia rank globally for nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, annual growth rate?
- Brazil ranks 67th and Georgia ranks 66th of 209 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.