Burkina Faso vs Sri Lanka: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, annual growth rate

Burkina Faso
-39.61 % change on previous year
in 2024
Sri Lanka
-35.99 % change on previous year
in 2024
Burkina Faso rank
175th
Sri Lanka rank
172nd

Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, annual growth rate over time

  • Burkina Faso
  • Sri Lanka
-2000200400196219932024

How they compare

Sri Lanka currently reports -35.99 % change on previous year against -39.61 % change on previous year in Burkina Faso, a difference of 3.62 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 33 times across 51 shared years of data; in 1973 it was Burkina Faso ahead.

Burkina Faso ranks 175th and Sri Lanka ranks 172nd of 209 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Burkina Faso averaged higher in 4 and Sri Lanka in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burkina Faso Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
1970s 153.79 % change on previous year 3.66 % change on previous year 150.13 % change on previous year Burkina Faso
1980s 15.32 % change on previous year 6.56 % change on previous year 8.76 % change on previous year Burkina Faso
1990s 11.35 % change on previous year 0.3787 % change on previous year 10.97 % change on previous year Burkina Faso
2000s -20.19 % change on previous year 3.95 % change on previous year 24.14 % change on previous year Sri Lanka
2010s 8.1 % change on previous year 16.74 % change on previous year 8.64 % change on previous year Sri Lanka
2020s 26.4 % change on previous year -3.11 % change on previous year 29.51 % change on previous year Burkina Faso

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, annual growth rate, Burkina Faso or Sri Lanka?
Sri Lanka, at -35.99 % change on previous year against -39.61 % change on previous year in Burkina Faso as of 2024.
What is the difference in nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, annual growth rate between Burkina Faso and Sri Lanka?
3.62 % change on previous year, with Sri Lanka ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Sri Lanka?
51 years are reported by both, from 1973 to 2024.
How do Burkina Faso and Sri Lanka rank globally for nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, annual growth rate?
Burkina Faso ranks 175th and Sri Lanka ranks 172nd of 209 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burkina Faso vs Sri Lanka: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-potash-k2o-total-agricultural-use-annual-growth-rate/burkina-faso/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-potash-k2o-total-agricultural-use-annual-growth-rate/burkina-faso/sri-lanka/">Burkina Faso vs Sri Lanka: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
240 places, 11,637 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.