Burundi vs New Caledonia: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, annual growth rate

Burundi
0 % change on previous year
in 2024
New Caledonia
0 % change on previous year
in 2024
Burundi rank
88th
New Caledonia rank
88th

Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, annual growth rate over time

  • Burundi
  • New Caledonia
02505007501.0k197019972024

How they compare

Burundi currently reports 0 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in New Caledonia, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 21 times across 44 shared years of data; in 1976 it was Burundi ahead.

Burundi ranks 88th and New Caledonia ranks 88th of 209 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Burundi averaged higher in 3 and New Caledonia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burundi New Caledonia Difference Ahead
1970s 159.21 % change on previous year 226.21 % change on previous year 67 % change on previous year New Caledonia
1980s 60.87 % change on previous year 80.75 % change on previous year 19.88 % change on previous year New Caledonia
1990s 16.12 % change on previous year 8.33 % change on previous year 7.78 % change on previous year Burundi
2000s 11.05 % change on previous year 0.0125 % change on previous year 11.04 % change on previous year Burundi
2010s 95.7 % change on previous year 13.42 % change on previous year 82.28 % change on previous year Burundi
2020s 0 % change on previous year 0 % change on previous year 0 % change on previous year

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, annual growth rate, Burundi or New Caledonia?
Burundi, at 0 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in New Caledonia as of 2024.
What is the difference in nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, annual growth rate between Burundi and New Caledonia?
0 % change on previous year, with Burundi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and New Caledonia?
44 years are reported by both, from 1976 to 2024.
How do Burundi and New Caledonia rank globally for nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, annual growth rate?
Burundi ranks 88th and New Caledonia ranks 88th of 209 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burundi vs New Caledonia: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-potash-k2o-total-agricultural-use-annual-growth-rate/burundi/new-caledonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-potash-k2o-total-agricultural-use-annual-growth-rate/burundi/new-caledonia/">Burundi vs New Caledonia: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
240 places, 11,637 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.