Cambodia vs Southern Africa: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, annual growth rate

Cambodia
270.01 % change on previous year
in 2024
Southern Africa
49.97 % change on previous year
in 2024
Cambodia rank
4th
Southern Africa rank
1st

Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, annual growth rate over time

  • Cambodia
  • Southern Africa
-1000100200300400196219932024

How they compare

Cambodia currently reports 270.01 % change on previous year against 49.97 % change on previous year in Southern Africa, a difference of 220.04 % change on previous year.

That makes Cambodia's figure about 5.4 times Southern Africa's.

The two have swapped places 15 times across 38 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Southern Africa ahead.

Cambodia ranks 4th and Southern Africa ranks 1st of 209 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Cambodia averaged higher in 5 and Southern Africa in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cambodia Southern Africa Difference Ahead
1960s 78.26 % change on previous year 13.99 % change on previous year 64.26 % change on previous year Cambodia
1970s -35.47 % change on previous year 9.58 % change on previous year 45.05 % change on previous year Southern Africa
1980s 12.22 % change on previous year 5.03 % change on previous year 7.2 % change on previous year Cambodia
1990s 0 % change on previous year 2.22 % change on previous year 2.22 % change on previous year Southern Africa
2000s 10.25 % change on previous year -1.48 % change on previous year 11.73 % change on previous year Cambodia
2010s 37.46 % change on previous year 10.45 % change on previous year 27.02 % change on previous year Cambodia
2020s 63.46 % change on previous year 7.88 % change on previous year 55.58 % change on previous year Cambodia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, annual growth rate, Cambodia or Southern Africa?
Cambodia, at 270.01 % change on previous year against 49.97 % change on previous year in Southern Africa as of 2024.
What is the difference in nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, annual growth rate between Cambodia and Southern Africa?
220.04 % change on previous year, with Cambodia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Southern Africa?
38 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2024.
How do Cambodia and Southern Africa rank globally for nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, annual growth rate?
Cambodia ranks 4th and Southern Africa ranks 1st of 209 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cambodia vs Southern Africa: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-potash-k2o-total-agricultural-use-annual-growth-rate/cambodia/southern-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-potash-k2o-total-agricultural-use-annual-growth-rate/cambodia/southern-africa/">Cambodia vs Southern Africa: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
240 places, 11,637 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.