Central Asia vs Papua New Guinea: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, annual growth rate
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, annual growth rate over time
- Central Asia
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports 36.6 % change on previous year against -9.58 % change on previous year in Central Asia, a difference of 46.18 % change on previous year.
That makes Papua New Guinea's figure about 3.8 times Central Asia's.
The two have swapped places 17 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Central Asia ahead.
Central Asia ranks 30th and Papua New Guinea ranks 31st of 31 groups.
Across the 4 decades both report, Central Asia averaged higher in 2 and Papua New Guinea in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central Asia | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 47.45 % change on previous year | -1.08 % change on previous year | 48.54 % change on previous year | Central Asia |
| 2000s | 14.07 % change on previous year | 43.25 % change on previous year | 29.18 % change on previous year | Papua New Guinea |
| 2010s | 14.24 % change on previous year | 0.183 % change on previous year | 14.06 % change on previous year | Central Asia |
| 2020s | 4.3 % change on previous year | 18.81 % change on previous year | 14.51 % change on previous year | Papua New Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, annual growth rate, Central Asia or Papua New Guinea?
- Papua New Guinea, at 36.6 % change on previous year against -9.58 % change on previous year in Central Asia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, annual growth rate between Central Asia and Papua New Guinea?
- 46.18 % change on previous year, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central Asia and Papua New Guinea?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
- How do Central Asia and Papua New Guinea rank globally for nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, annual growth rate?
- Central Asia ranks 30th and Papua New Guinea ranks 31st of 31 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.