Cuba vs Sri Lanka: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, annual growth rate
Cuba
-30.45 % change on previous year
in 2024
Sri Lanka
-35.99 % change on previous year
in 2024
Cuba rank
170th
Sri Lanka rank
172nd
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, annual growth rate over time
- Cuba
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Cuba currently reports -30.45 % change on previous year against -35.99 % change on previous year in Sri Lanka, a difference of 5.54 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 40 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 170th and Sri Lanka ranks 172nd of 209 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 6 and Sri Lanka in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 35.92 % change on previous year | 2.15 % change on previous year | 33.77 % change on previous year | Cuba |
| 1970s | -1.44 % change on previous year | 5.28 % change on previous year | 6.73 % change on previous year | Sri Lanka |
| 1980s | 6.63 % change on previous year | 6.56 % change on previous year | 0.0742 % change on previous year | Cuba |
| 1990s | 2.96 % change on previous year | 0.3787 % change on previous year | 2.58 % change on previous year | Cuba |
| 2000s | 7.71 % change on previous year | 2.99 % change on previous year | 4.72 % change on previous year | Cuba |
| 2010s | 21.25 % change on previous year | 16.74 % change on previous year | 4.52 % change on previous year | Cuba |
| 2020s | 1.68 % change on previous year | -3.11 % change on previous year | 4.79 % change on previous year | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, annual growth rate, Cuba or Sri Lanka?
- Cuba, at -30.45 % change on previous year against -35.99 % change on previous year in Sri Lanka as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, annual growth rate between Cuba and Sri Lanka?
- 5.54 % change on previous year, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Sri Lanka?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2024.
- How do Cuba and Sri Lanka rank globally for nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, annual growth rate?
- Cuba ranks 170th and Sri Lanka ranks 172nd of 209 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.