Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Mauritania: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, annual growth rate

Democratic Republic of the Congo
0 % change on previous year
in 2024
Mauritania
0 % change on previous year
in 2024
Democratic Republic of the Congo rank
88th
Mauritania rank
88th

Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, annual growth rate over time

  • Democratic Republic of the Congo
  • Mauritania
0200400600196219932024

How they compare

Democratic Republic of the Congo currently reports 0 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in Mauritania, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 16 times across 25 shared years of data; in 1974 it was Mauritania ahead.

Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 88th and Mauritania ranks 88th of 209 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Democratic Republic of the Congo averaged higher in 2 and Mauritania in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Democratic Republic of the Congo Mauritania Difference Ahead
1970s -11.3 % change on previous year 156.75 % change on previous year 168.04 % change on previous year Mauritania
1980s 9.09 % change on previous year 250 % change on previous year 240.91 % change on previous year Mauritania
2000s -10.2 % change on previous year -8.71 % change on previous year 1.48 % change on previous year Mauritania
2010s 30.02 % change on previous year 7.29 % change on previous year 22.73 % change on previous year Democratic Republic of the Congo
2020s 4.35 % change on previous year -0.7648 % change on previous year 5.12 % change on previous year Democratic Republic of the Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, annual growth rate, Democratic Republic of the Congo or Mauritania?
Democratic Republic of the Congo, at 0 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in Mauritania as of 2024.
What is the difference in nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, annual growth rate between Democratic Republic of the Congo and Mauritania?
0 % change on previous year, with Democratic Republic of the Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of the Congo and Mauritania?
25 years are reported by both, from 1974 to 2024.
How do Democratic Republic of the Congo and Mauritania rank globally for nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, annual growth rate?
Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 88th and Mauritania ranks 88th of 209 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Mauritania: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-potash-k2o-total-agricultural-use-annual-growth-rate/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/mauritania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-potash-k2o-total-agricultural-use-annual-growth-rate/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/mauritania/">Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Mauritania: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
240 places, 11,637 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.