Eastern Europe vs Guatemala: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, annual growth rate

Eastern Europe
-0.4496 % change on previous year
in 2024
Guatemala
41.09 % change on previous year
in 2024
Eastern Europe rank
23rd
Guatemala rank
26th

Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, annual growth rate over time

  • Eastern Europe
  • Guatemala
-1000100200300196219932024

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 41.09 % change on previous year against -0.4496 % change on previous year in Eastern Europe, a difference of 41.54 % change on previous year.

That makes Guatemala's figure about 91.4 times Eastern Europe's.

The two have swapped places 37 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Eastern Europe ahead.

Eastern Europe ranks 23rd and Guatemala ranks 26th of 31 groups.

Across the 7 decades both report, Eastern Europe averaged higher in 2 and Guatemala in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eastern Europe Guatemala Difference Ahead
1960s 15.13 % change on previous year 30.66 % change on previous year 15.53 % change on previous year Guatemala
1970s 6.19 % change on previous year 55.04 % change on previous year 48.86 % change on previous year Guatemala
1980s 1.91 % change on previous year -1.29 % change on previous year 3.2 % change on previous year Eastern Europe
1990s -16.16 % change on previous year 15.49 % change on previous year 31.65 % change on previous year Guatemala
2000s 3.79 % change on previous year -4.57 % change on previous year 8.36 % change on previous year Eastern Europe
2010s 1.69 % change on previous year 21.86 % change on previous year 20.18 % change on previous year Guatemala
2020s -1.26 % change on previous year 17.11 % change on previous year 18.37 % change on previous year Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, annual growth rate, Eastern Europe or Guatemala?
Guatemala, at 41.09 % change on previous year against -0.4496 % change on previous year in Eastern Europe as of 2024.
What is the difference in nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, annual growth rate between Eastern Europe and Guatemala?
41.54 % change on previous year, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eastern Europe and Guatemala?
63 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2024.
How do Eastern Europe and Guatemala rank globally for nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, annual growth rate?
Eastern Europe ranks 23rd and Guatemala ranks 26th of 31 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eastern Europe vs Guatemala: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-potash-k2o-total-agricultural-use-annual-growth-rate/eastern-europe/guatemala/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-potash-k2o-total-agricultural-use-annual-growth-rate/eastern-europe/guatemala/">Eastern Europe vs Guatemala: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
240 places, 11,637 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.